Legal Opinion
Arrington v. Daniels
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 8, 2006No. Civil 05-1352-HA, 05-1344-HA, 05-1348-HA, 05-1342-HA, 05-1345-HA, 05-1350-HA, 05-1343-HA, 05-1347-HA, 05-1351-HAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER
HAGGERTY, Chief Judge.
Numerous petitions for a Writ of Habe-as Corpus were filed with this court challenging certain policy statements of the Drug and Alcohol Treatment Progam (DAP) implemented by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) as promulgated in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA). These cases alleged the same constitutional violations. Accordingly, they were consolidated by the court and the cases of Arrington v. Daniels, 05-1352-HA, and Williams v. Daniels, 05-1346-HA, were designated as lead cases. Opinions will be issued for the two lead cases. This…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lopez v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Barbara E. Fraley v. United States Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Bruce Downey v. Joseph Crabtree, Warden, Federal Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Paul N. Bowen v. Robert A. Hood, 1 Warden, Fci, SheridanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations v. U.S. Bureau of ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arrington v. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Lewis v. DanielsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2007
- Arrington v. Charles DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008