Legal Opinion

Edler v. Rogers

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1991No. 91-51PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*887OPINION

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Rita Edler appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of Ap-pellee Donna Rogers. Edler claimed that she loaned money to Wesley Cranmore to be used in an automobile purchasing partnership between Rogers and Cranmore and that Rogers is liable as a partner for the money Edler loaned to Cranmore.

We affirm.

The issue is simple and straightforward. Edler claims there are genuine issues of material fact regarding whether Rogers and Cranmore were partners and, therefore, under this Court’s prevailing standard for the review of summary judgments, the summary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. True v. Hi-Plains Elevator MacHinery, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Baros v. WellsWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Scott v. Bryn Mawr ArmsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Piggly-Wiggly Stores, Inc. v. LowensteinIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Robinson v. BellWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Redland v. RedlandWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Popejoy v. SteinleWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Leavell v. LinnWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Norris v. BeselWyoming Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API