Jackson v. United States
United States Court of Claims
The Reporters’ statement of the case : The facts appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Peelle, Ch. J.,
delivered the opinion of the court:
The claimant seeks to recover the difference between the sum of $1,200 per annum paid him from August 1, 1890, to June 30, 1897, and $1,300 per annum during the same period *40claimed by him, as averred in his petition, by reason of having been appointed “ superintendent of delivery ” at the post-office at Hartford, Conn., under the act of March 2, 1889, making appropriations for the Post-Oce Department. (25 Stat. L., 841, 842.)
By this act the Postmaster-General is authorized to classify and fix the salaries of the clerks and employees attached…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Romero v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1889
- Belcher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1899
- Barrett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1901
3Cited by9 opinions
- Baker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Goutos v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Coleman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
- Amundson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
- Arant v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.