Legal Opinion

Jackson v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 3, 1906No. 20844PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The Reporters’ statement of the case : The facts appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Peelle, Ch. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The claimant seeks to recover the difference between the sum of $1,200 per annum paid him from August 1, 1890, to June 30, 1897, and $1,300 per annum during the same period *40claimed by him, as averred in his petition, by reason of having been appointed “ superintendent of delivery ” at the post-office at Hartford, Conn., under the act of March 2, 1889, making appropriations for the Post-Oce Department. (25 Stat. L., 841, 842.)

By this act the Postmaster-General is authorized to classify and fix the salaries of the clerks and employees attached…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Romero v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1889
  2. Belcher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1899
  3. Barrett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1901

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Baker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  2. Goutos v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  3. Coleman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
  4. Amundson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  5. Arant v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API