Legal Opinion

Schiele v. Anderson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 17, 1929No. Gen. No. 32,934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ryner

This writ of error was sued out. by a purchaser, pendente lite, of real estate in process of foreclosure. The plaintiff in error, Rubin, contends that the bonds foreclosed were violative of the statute against usury and that the complainant in the foreclosure suit failed to establish his ownership of the securities.

In the latter part of the year 1922, John. J. Loughlin and his brother were the owners of real estate located at Seventy-third street and Bennett avenue in the City of Chicago. For the purpose of financing the construction of a building upon the premises they applied to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hibernian Banking Ass'n v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Crawford v. NimmonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Raming v. PeyserAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
  2. Wilson v. ReedAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
  3. Chicago Assets Co. v. WatrousAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
  4. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. RubinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API