Legal Opinion

Ctr. for Responsible Sci. v. Gottlieb

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 27, 2018No. Civil Action Nos. 17–2198 (JEB)PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge

Plaintiffs-three individuals and the Center for Responsible Science-believe that everyone who participates in a clinical-drug trial should be aware of differences in the data between preclinical animal testing and clinical human-subject experimentation. To that end, in May 2014, they submitted a Citizen Petition to the Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration requesting that three specific warnings be added to the standard informed-consent materials. When the FDA denied the Petition, Plaintiffs brought this one-count Administrative *7Procedu…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  4. Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  5. Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Deppner v. Spectrum Health Care Res., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Touvian v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. Pueschel v. ChaoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Ctr. for Responsible Sci. v. GottliebCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. Garcia v. Skanska USA Bldg., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API