Legal Opinion

Troutman v. Cohen

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 8, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-3534, 83-5983PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

VANARTSDALEN, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiffs in Civil Action 83-3534 filed a complaint on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated challenging the validity of the Pennsylvania Department of Welfare’s recently adopted amendments to the regulations regarding skilled nursing care under Title XIX of the Social Security Act (commonly called Medicaid), 42 U.S.C. § 1396-1396p. The gravamen of plaintiffs’ complaint is that the state’s new definition of skilled care is impermissibly stricter than that provided by federal law, thus resulting in the reduction in the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. St. Francis Extended Health Care v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Folden v. Washington State Department of Social & Health ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. KobrinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Wilmac Corp. v. HecklerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API