Legal Opinion

Heyer v. Sullivan

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 28, 1917PublishedCited by 12 opinions

On'bill, &e.

1Opinion of the Court

Backes, V. C.

■This bill is to recover a specific legacy of ten -snares of the capital stock of the Jersey City Horse Manure Company. Mary Sullivap, deceased,-owned thirty-twq shares of the stock of this company,-and by. her will dated February 10th, 1912, bequeathed ten shares to the complainant and the remaining shares to her son; the defendant, Michael A. Sullivan. Sullivan claims the thirty-two shares by gift from his mother under date of January 12th, 1910, at which time the stock was transferred to him upon .the books of the company. The prayer-is that Sullivan transfer .to the…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re FulperNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1926
  2. In Re Kelly's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Morrisse v. InglisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
  4. Middlesex County Welfare Board v. MotolinskyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  5. Vanderbach v. VollingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API