Legal Opinion
People v. Sandoval
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 5, 1971No. 25781PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
434 F.2d 635
The PEOPLE of the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Frank Joseph SANDOVAL and James Vigil,
Defendants-Petitioners-Appellants, v.The CITY OF LOS
ANGELES, a Municipal Corporation, roger Arnebergh,
CityAttorney thereof, Edward Davis, Chief of Police thereof,
Collier McDermon, JohnDoe I to Xinclusive, and Municipal
Court of Los Angeles Judicial District, the Hon. JudgeDavid
I. Aisenson, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 25781.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 20, 1970, Rehearing Denied Feb. 5, 1971.
Manuel Ruiz (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Howard Fox (argued),…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Greenwood v. PeacockSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Georgia v. RachelSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- California v. SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
3Cited by4 opinions
- Charles Edward Davis v. Superior Court of the State of California, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Commonwealth of Kentucky v. StrasburgDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020
- Hafer v. PeopleDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Salinas v. Commonwealth of KentuckyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020