Legal Opinion

Elliot Luis Strickland, Jr. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 8, 1964No. 17318PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICKELSON, District Judge.

Appellant, Strickland, has appealed from an order denying correction of sentence under Rule 35, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

On March 28, 1958, appellant, appearing with court appointed counsel, waived prosecution by indictment and consented to be proceeded against by information. The information charged appellant with willfully causing interstate transportation of three forged checks, each check a separate count, in violation of sections 2314 and 2(b) of Title 18 U.S.C.A. That same day, upon arraignment, a plea of guilty was entered to each of the three…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Castle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Stanley v. Kessel, Vance W. Heideman, and George Harding Bryant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  3. Strickland v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1963

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harold Ray Amer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  2. Irving Gilinsky, Also Known as Samuel Benjamin Feldman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. Irving Gilinsky, Also Known as Samuel Benjamin Feldman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  4. Wallace Ray Coon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  5. Horace E. Hollis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API