Legal Opinion

Crosby v. Calaway

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 8, 1941No. 28840PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

With reference to the motion to dismiss the writ of error, grounds (1) because the assignment of error is insufficient in law, and (2) because rule 9 of this court is not complied with in that there is a failure to state the reasons why this court and not •the Supreme Court has jurisdiction, are without merit. Ground 1 is controlled adversely to movant by Baker v. Higgenbotham, 186 Ga. 895 (199 S. E. 174), and cit. Ground 2 is controlled adversely to movant by Kerns v. Crawford, 51 Ga. App. 158 (179 S. E. 854).

This case is for review on exceptions to the judgment overruling the demurrers to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Krueger v. MacDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  2. Coffer v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  3. Kimbrough v. BoswellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Harden v. Georgia RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. Evans v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Warnock v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  2. Chester v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Sirmons v. Derst Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Cook v. Safeway Stores IncorporatedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Scoggins v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API