Legal Opinion

Lanphere & Urbaniak v. Colorado

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 19, 1994No. 92-1363PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs brought suit against the State of Colorado under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming a violation of their First and Fourteenth Amendment free speech rights and requesting injunctive relief. Plaintiffs’ claims are the result of a Colorado state statute limiting public access to criminal justice and official action records containing individual names, addresses, and telephone numbers where access is sought for the purpose of directly soliciting business for pecuniary gain. The district court granted summary judgment for defendant. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Shero v. City of Grove, Okl.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Mann v. BoatrightCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. Smith v. PlatiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. McVeighCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  5. U.S. West, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API