Legal Opinion
Mahler v. United States
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 30, 2000No. CIV.A. 3:95 CV 2732(SRU), 3:96 CV271(SRU) through 3:96 CV273(SRU)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
UNDERHILL, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, Russell Mahler, Sr. (“Russell Senior”), Stelle Mahler (“Stelle”), Russell Mahler, Jr. (“Russell Junior”) and William Mahler (“William”) each commenced an action, now consolidated, to obtain refunds of money they had paid in partial satisfaction of federal tax assessments and liens levied against them. These assessments were made as one hundred percent penalties pursuant to the provisions of Section 6672 of the Internal Revenue Code, on the grounds that the plaintiffs had willfully failed to remit certain withholding and Federal…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Slodov v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Robert W. Monday v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. John A. Monday, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Mary Rem, Syma Lichter, and Nathan Hanfling, as Executors of the Estate of Henry Rem, Gerard RemCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. SoteloSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mazo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Branagan, Jr.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Gonzalez v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Mahler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002