Legal Opinion

Eickhoff v. Eickhoff

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1902No. 4156PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error io the District Court of Arapahoe County,

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Campbell

The defendant in error, as plaintiff below, brought her action of divorce against the plaintiff in error, defendant below, alleging cruelty. On the 13th of September, 1897, she filed a petition for temporary alimony, attorney fees and suit money, alleging, among other things, that she is in indigent circumstances, and has no means with which to pay the expenses of the litigation, and that her husband, the defendant, is a man of large means, worth about fifty thousand dollars.

Upon the hearing petitioner presented her proofs and responde- inter alia, read what purported to be a verified ; m /er…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daniels v. DanielsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  2. Hite v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Lea v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. Kiefer v. KieferColorado Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Cowan v. CowanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bancroft v. BancroftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. State ex rel. Buttnick v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  4. Pierce v. OtteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  5. Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API