Legal Opinion

Spacal v. Marietta

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 22, 1994No. 93-2033PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WOLF, Judge.

The claimant in this case appeals from a final order in which the judge of compensation claims (JCC) denied claimant’s request for surgery to correct complications she is suffering as a result of an approved surgical procedure. We find that an employer/earrier (E/C) which has authorized surgery is required to provide any remedial treatment and care which is necessitated as a result of the authorized surgery or complications thereof. We, therefore, reverse and remand for further findings as to the E/C’s responsibility to provide the requested medical treatment.

Claimant was injured…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Abbenante v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. Market v. LutzSupreme Court of Florida · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. BYSCZYNSKI v. United Parcel Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API