Spacal v. Marietta
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WOLF, Judge.
The claimant in this case appeals from a final order in which the judge of compensation claims (JCC) denied claimant’s request for surgery to correct complications she is suffering as a result of an approved surgical procedure. We find that an employer/earrier (E/C) which has authorized surgery is required to provide any remedial treatment and care which is necessitated as a result of the authorized surgery or complications thereof. We, therefore, reverse and remand for further findings as to the E/C’s responsibility to provide the requested medical treatment.
Claimant was injured…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Abbenante v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1970
- Market v. LutzSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
3Cited by1 opinion
- BYSCZYNSKI v. United Parcel Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010