Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Gould

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from special term, Monroe county. Action by Charles W. Palmer against Augusta B. Gould, Augustus C. Bowen, and Jennie M. Bowen for the specific performance of a contract to convey land. The complaint was dismissed as to Jennie M. Bowen. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtDwight, P. J.

The action was for the specific performance of a contract to convey land, which was signed, on the part of the vendors, by the defendant Augusta B. Gould, for herself, and also in the names of the other two defendants, Augustus C. Bowen and Jennie M. Bowen, as their attorney in fact. The land was owned by Mrs. Gould and Augustus 0. Bowen, who were brother and sister, in undivided shares. Jennie M. Bowen was the wife of Augustus G., and had no interest in the land except her inchoate right of dower. The complaint was dismissed as to her on findings that Mrs. Gould had no authority to sign the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Phoenix Ins. Co. v. . Continental Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Gray v. CrosbyNew York Supreme Court · 1820

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moss & Raley v. WrenTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Texlouana Producing & Refining Co. v. WallTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  3. La Prelle v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Mooney v. MooneyNew York Supreme Court · 1899
  5. La Prelle v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API