Legal Opinion

Francisco Herrera-Genao v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 3, 2016No. 14-4743UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION *

FISHER, Circuit Judge.

Francisco Herrera-Genao appeals from the denial of his motion to vacate his criminal sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the basis of his counsel’s alleged ineffective assistance during plea negotiations. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm.

I

We write principally for the parties, who are familiar with the factual context and legal history of the ease. Therefore, we set forth only those facts that are necessary to our analysis.

In 2007, Herrera-Genao and three co-conspirators committed four armed bank robberies in New Jersey. Although the facts varied…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. United States v. Dung BuiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  5. Randall Shotts v. John WetzelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. HERRERA-GENAO v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
  2. HERRERA-GENAO v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API