Legal Opinion

Ladd v. Newell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 10, 1885PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from two orders of the district court for Renville ■county, Webber, J., presiding, the first granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial unless the defendants should stipulate that judgment might be entered for plaintiff for $18.80, the value of certain bags, and the second denying the motion for a new trial, the defendants having made the stipulation.

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff for the recovery of a quantity of wheat alleged to have been wrongfully taken from her possession by defendants. The defendants Geo. R. Newell & Co. are judgment creditors of Jos. W. Ladd, who is the husband of plaintiff, and the wheat was levied on and taken by the sheriff under an execution upon a judgment in their favor against him. The jury found for the defendants upon the issue raised as to the ownership of the property, which necessarily involved a finding that the plaintiff’s claim of title was merely a cover or protection used by J. W. Ladd to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Knapp v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. Hossfeldt v. DillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  3. McDonald v. City of Red WingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
  4. Paul v. SlasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1850

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Genzel v. HalvorsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Greene v. MathiowetzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. Price v. GriegerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Irish v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  5. Hoover v. CarverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API