Legal Opinion

People v. Ludlow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1992PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record supports County Court’s *937firiding that defendant, despite his limited intellectual capacity, knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his Miranda rights and agreed to speak to the police (see, People v Williams, 62 NY2d 285, 287; People v Matthews, 148 AD2d 272, 274, lv dismissed 74 NY2d 950). The record also supports the suppression court’s determination that defendant was not in custody before the Miranda warnings were given. A reasonable person, innocent of any crime, would not have believed he was in custody under the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. YuklNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. CentanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. WarneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. People v. BrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. People v. ThayerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. People v. LettsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. People v. DengelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API