Citizen Potawatomi Nation v. State of Oklahoma
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Oklahoma and the Citizen Potawatomi Nation (the “Nation”) entered into a Tribal-State gaming compact (the “Compact”). See 25 U.S.C. § 2710(d)(3) (providing for such compacts). Part 12 of the Compact contains a dispute-resolution procedure that calls for arbitration of disagreements “arising under” the Compact’s provisions. It also indicates that either party may, “[n]otwithstanding any provision of law,” “bring an action against the other in a federal district court for the de novo review of any arbitration award.” In Hall Street Associates, LLC. v.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- PolyOne Corp. v. Westlake Vinyls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- West Flagler Associates, Ltd. v. Debra HaalandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2023
- Avient Corp. v. Westlake Vinyls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
- Avient Corporation v. Westlake Vinyls, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022
- Question Submitted by: The Honorable Avery Frix, Oklahoma State Senate, District 9, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.