Legal Opinion

United States v. Maass

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 25, 2002No. 01-1068PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*299ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

James Carl Maass, a federal inmate, filed this appeal to assert numerous challenges to the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. In a prior order, we granted a certificate of appealability (COA), see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), limited to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. Orlando MoraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Iris Collette Jackson Dwight Dean JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Maass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API