Aetna Life & Casualty v. Estate of Engard
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MacKENZIE, J.S.C.
On a motion for summary judgment, this Court is presented with a novel question of statutory construction involving the Workers’ Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-1, et seq. The issue is whether a workers’ compensation insurance carrier that paid a lump-sum settlement pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-20 should be reimbursed pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-40 from the proceeds of a third-party tort recovery. Consideration of the interplay between these statutory sections leads the Court to conclude that a carrier cannot recoup any part of a settlement which it previously paid under…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Watt v. Mayor and Council of Borough of FranklinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- State v. FederankoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Barringer v. MieleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Manfredi EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- EBI Companies/Orion Group v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- PAOLO MARANO VS. CLIFFORD J. SCHOB, M.D. (L-6604-12, ESSEX COUNTY AND STAEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018