Legal Opinion

Aetna Life & Casualty v. Estate of Engard

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 24, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MacKENZIE, J.S.C.

On a motion for summary judgment, this Court is presented with a novel question of statutory construction involving the Workers’ Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-1, et seq. The issue is whether a workers’ compensation insurance carrier that paid a lump-sum settlement pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-20 should be reimbursed pursuant to N.J.S.A. 34:15-40 from the proceeds of a third-party tort recovery. Consideration of the interplay between these statutory sections leads the Court to conclude that a carrier cannot recoup any part of a settlement which it previously paid under…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Watt v. Mayor and Council of Borough of FranklinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  3. State v. FederankoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. Barringer v. MieleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  5. Manfredi EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. EBI Companies/Orion Group v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  2. PAOLO MARANO VS. CLIFFORD J. SCHOB, M.D. (L-6604-12, ESSEX COUNTY AND STAEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API