Legal Opinion
Machado v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
Decided November 7, 1995No. Docket Nos. 17664-92, 17665-92UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSEPH E. MACHADO, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent; ROBERT R. MACHADO AND KERRY S. MACHADO, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Machado v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 17664-92, 17665-92.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1995-526; 1995 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 524; 70 T.C.M. (CCH) 1165;
November 7, 1995, Filed
Decisions will be entered under Rule 155.
Joseph E. Machado and Robert R. Machado, pro sese.
Maria D. Murphy, for respondent.
SWIFT, Judge
SWIFT, Judge
MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION
SWIFT, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in and additions…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Neely v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
- Dreicer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
- Golanty v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
- Engdahl v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
- Allen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- O'CONNOR v. COMMISSIONERUnited States Tax Court · 2001
- Whitecavage v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2008