Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Malinou v. LaFrance

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 21, 1970No. 1144-AppealPublished

1ConcurrenceJoslin, J.

I concur with the result reached by the majority, but for a different reason.

*43Martin S. Malinou, plaintiff, pro se. Attorneys for defendant: Moore, Virgadamo, Boyle & Lynch, Salvatore L. Virgadamo, Francis J. Boyle, Laurent L. Rousseau; Maurice W. Hendel, Stephen F. Achille, John Quattrocchi, Jr:, Herbert F. DeSimone, Attorney General, W. Slater Allen, Assistant Attorney General.

■ -The - challenge is'to the fundamental fairness of a System1 'which entitles the names of an endorsed'candidate for a party nomination to be marked with an asterisk and to first-column listing on the voting machine;…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. De Stefanis v. Rhode Island State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API