Legal Opinion

Cochran v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 18, 2006No. A05A1700PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MlKELL, Judge.

Richard Allen Cochran appeals the denial of his motion for new trial following his conviction of aggravated assault. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and the propriety of the prosecutor’s closing argument. We affirm for the reasons stated below.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, and an appellant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence. This court determines whether the evidence is sufficient under the standard of Jackson v. Virginia, [443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979)] and does…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Mullins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  4. Pittman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  5. Campbell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Jarrett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Tidwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Myers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API