Legal Opinion · Dissent

Scotiabank de Puerto Rico v. Burgos

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 16, 2014No. 12-9005Published

1DissentSelya, Circuit Judge

The majority focuses with laser-like intensity on the question of whether the intervals purchased by the timeshare buyers in this case constitute real property as opposed to purely contractual interests. After deciding that those intervals comprise real property, the majority then washes its hands of the matter.

In my view, the majority incorrectly answers the question that it poses. Equally as important, this question — no matter how it is answered — is not dispositive of the broader question of the parties’ rights in bankruptcy. For both of these reasons, I respectfully dissent.

The scene is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Smart v. Gillette Co. Long-Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. DunbarCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  5. Michelson v. Digital Financial ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API