Wills v. Potter

OPINION

FRANKS, Judge.

The parties to this action leased adjoining pasture lands during 1984 and 1985, and the trial judge, without the intervention of a jury, awarded judgment to the plaintiffs, stating: “[I]t was negligence on Mr. Potter not to remove the bulls which he knew or should have known were going to impregnate these young heifers.” He likewise awarded a judgment to Potter against the Wills because in 1984 Potter’s heifers were “exposed to the Holstein bull” owned by the Wills. After setting off the amount awarded to Potter, a judgment was entered for the Wills in the amount of…