Finance Co. of Pennsylvania v. Charleston, C. & C. R.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of South. Carolina. The facts, as sufficiently stated by counsel, are these: On December 10, 1890, the Finance Company of Pennsylvania and others, complainants, filed their bill in the circuit court of the United States for the District of South Carolina, against the Charleston, Cincinnati c% Chicago Railroad Company, the Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Company, and others, alleging: The incorporation of the…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of South. Carolina. The facts, as sufficiently stated by counsel, are these: On December 10, 1890, the Finance Company of Pennsylvania and others, complainants, filed their bill in the circuit court of the United States for the District of South Carolina, against the Charleston, Cincinnati c% Chicago Railroad Company, the Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Company, and others, alleging: The incorporation of the railroad company, for the purpose of constructing and operating-a railroad from Charleston, S. C., to Ashland, Ky., a…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller
(after stating the facts as above). It was conceded, on the argument, that the item mentioned in the second assignment of error related to a balance due by the receiver of the Chaileston, Cincinnati & Chicago Railroad Company to the Richmond & Danville Railroad Company, which had accrued subsequent to Ms appointment, and which, as a matter of fact, had been paid, and we assume that the intention of counsel was to question the allowance of the fourth, item for §8,095.58, and it will be so regarded. The two items complained of were for freight on shipments of coal, cars, oil, etc., consigned to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Union Trust Co. v. Illinois Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Thomas v. Western Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Miltenberger v. Logansport Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Morgan's Louisiana & Texas Railroad & Steamship Co. v. Texas Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States Trust Co. v. Wabash Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Van Schaick v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Central Trust Co. of New York v. East Tennessee, V. & G. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- New England R. v. Carnegie Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1896
- Atlantic Trust Co. v. Woodbridge Canal & Irrigation Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1897
- Wood v. New York & N. E. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1895
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.