Legal Opinion
Regence Blueshield v. Philip Morris, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided January 6, 1999No. C98-559RPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING CERTAIN DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER FED.R.CIV.P. 12(b)(6)
ROTHSTEIN, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the court on certain defendants’ motions to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim, to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(7) for fail ure to join necessary parties and defendant B.A.T. Industries’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The court has reviewed the documents filed in support of and in opposition to the motions together with the relevant files. Being fully advised, the court grants the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Schowengerdt v. General Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Oregon Laborers-Employers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Steamfitters Local Union No. 420 Welfare Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Service Employees Int'l Union Health & Welfare Fund v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Association of Washington Public Hospital Districts v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1999
- In Re tobacco/governmental Health Care CostsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Republic of Guatemala v. Tobacco Institute, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.