Legal Opinion

Lord v. Kelley

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 19, 1963No. Civ. A. 63-932PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYZANSKI, District Judge.

After being twice amended, the complaint in this case has become in effect principally, though not exclusively, a preindictment pleading under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(e) by Lord, as possessor, and by McGarry and other individuals, partnerships, and corporations listed in paragraph XIII of the complaint, as owners, to return records seized from Lord, by Flattery and others, and to suppress the evidentiary use of those records in any federal criminal proceeding which may be undertaken against the complainants.

These are the underlying facts.

1. McGarry and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Rea v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Cleary v. BolgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Suarez v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  2. In the Matter of the Application of Lafayette Academy, Inc., Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Premises Known as 608 Taylor Ave., Apartment 302, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Appeal of Harold MargolisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  4. Louis Sager Hunsucker, Jr. v. Robert L. Phinney, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. State of Iowa v. Union Asphalt & Roadoils, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1968

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API