State v. Sumlin
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
820 S.W.2d 487 (1991)
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Rufus M. SUMLIN, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 73828.
Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.
December 17, 1991.
Scott E. Walter, Clayton, Janet M. Thompson, Columbia, for defendant-appellant.
William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Ronald L. Jurgeson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for plaintiff-respondent.
BENTON, Judge.
Appellant, Rufus M. Sumlin, was found guilty of violating § 195.020 RSMo 1986[1] and was sentenced to concurrent terms of twenty years and five years under § 195.200 (1986). A timely notice of appeal was filed.
In…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Blackmar; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Blackmar.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.