Vance v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Monroe District Cowrt. • These actions were brought by 'plaintiffs, to recover certain lands in Monroe county, which they claim as the devisees of Samuel Harris, deceased. •
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Oh. J.
I. Appellant’s counsel first urge as erroneous the ruling of the court admitting the will of Samuel Harris *427in evidence, and in argument five separate objections are urged against the admissibility of the will. It is a sufficient answer to all of these objections that the abstracts of record fail to show that any objection was made to this evidence in the court below, or that any exceptions -were taken thereto.
If, however, objections had been properly made and exceprtions taken, we find no error in the ruling of the court. In the abstract furnished by appellees, the will is fully…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Morris v. SargentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Knapp v. AlvordNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
- Cassiday v. M'KenzieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842
- Houghtaling v. MarvinNew York Supreme Court · 1849
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Furenes v. EideSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899