State v. Irby
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.
¶1 This appeal from a conviction for aggravated murder is unusual in that defendant Terrance Irby waived both his right to be represented at trial and his right to be present. Irby’s absence did not excuse the trial court and the prosecutor from their responsibility to assure that Irby’s jury was fair and impartial. One of the jurors said during voir dire that she “would like to say he’s guilty.” There was no inquiry by the court or the prosecutor that might have neutralized the meaning of these words. When a juror makes an unqualified statement expressing actual bias, seating the juror is a…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. PetrichWashington Supreme Court · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. LawlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State Of Washington v. Mario R Guevara-diazCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State v. SlertWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- State Of Washington v. Song WangCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State Of Washington v. Terrance Jon IrbyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.