Mancano v. Novak
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Mark Anthony Mancano brought this petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, alleging that his resentencing violated his due process rights and subjected him to double jeopardy. He also claims his counsel was ineffective. The district court denied relief, and denied Mr. Mancano’s requests for a certificate of appealability (COA) and for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Mr. Mancano appeals and renews his requests.
Mr. Mancano pled guilty in 1996 to state charges and was sentenced to two years probation. His probation was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lennox v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Martin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- People v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- People v. ChavezColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.