Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Attison

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 1, 1960No. 9326PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AYRES, Judge.

By this action plaintiffs, as the owners of a Ford pickup truck, seek to recover of the defendants damages in the sum of $117.88 sustained by the truck in a collision with a Ford automobile of the defendants. Defendant, Robert W. Attison, reconvened and seeks to recover of the plaintiffs damages sustained by the Ford car in the sum of $181.92.

The trial court concluded, as to the issue of negligence, neither plaintiffs nor defendants had sustained the burden of proof prerequisite to their recovery. From a judgment accordingly rejecting the demands of both plaintiffs and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American Fidelity & Casualty Company v. Mrs. Claire DrexlerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  2. Nomey v. Great American Indemnity CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Carkuff v. Geophysical Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. BaumgardnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Kirby v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Poleman v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. LeBreton v. BallangaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Clark v. TolbertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API