Legal Opinion
Rogers v. United States
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided April 11, 1963No. 5578, 5620PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAILEY BROWN, District Judge.
These are actions brought by Andrew Cleveland Rogers III, a minor, and by his father, Andrew Cleveland Rogers, Jr., against the United States of America under the Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C.A. § 2671 et seq.) They seek to recover damages for injuries they allege were received by young Rogers as the result of an operation performed on him at the Lockbourne Air Force Base Hospital at Columbus, Ohio. This case was, of course, tried by the Court without a jury, and this memorandum decision is being filed in lieu of Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
In…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
- Kuhn v. BankerOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Beach v. ChollettOhio Court of Appeals · 1928
3Cited by6 opinions
- Steeves v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1968
- Albert Dupeck and Bessie Dupeck v. Union Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Andrew Cleveland Rogers, III and Andrew Cleveland Rogers, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Finley v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1970
- Robinson v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, S.D. California · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.