Legal Opinion

In re Guilford Water Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 1, 1919PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Exceptions under R. S., Chap. 55, Sec. 55, from the ruling and findings of Public Utilities Commission. Judgment in accordance with opinion. Case stated in opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

The corporation of the Guilford Water Company owes its existence to a charter specially granted in the year of 1909. P. & S. L., Chap. 226. Its powers were broadened by an act of 1911. P. & S. L., Chap. 249. So far as relevant to the issues of this case, the original grant of authority limited the Company to conveying to and supplying the inhabitants of the town of Guilford “with water for all domestic, sanitary, municipal, and commercial purposes.” The town was empowered “to contract with said corporation for a supply of water for fire or other purposes for a term of years, and at the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Thurlow v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  3. Knox v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Stone v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. City of Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. City of New York v. . NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Baxter v. Waterville Sewerage DistrictSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  3. Langley v. Home Indemnity CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  4. Sutter Butte Canal Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Sutter Butte Canal Co. v. Railroad CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API