Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Board of Health v. Schmidt

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 6, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stevens, Y. O.

That the piggery in question, containing throughout the year from fifty to one hundred pigs, large and small, is a private nuisance is proved beyond question. The contention is that it is not a public nuisance — such a nuisance as is indictable. State v. Du Pont de Nemours Powder Co., 79 N. J. Eq. 32. In State v. Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co., 68 N. J. Law 512, it is said that if the indictment layr the nuisance as being committed near a highway and also near several dwelling-houses, it is sufficient. In Rex v. Neil, 2 C. & P. 485, in a passage quoted in 1 Russ. Cr. & M. *319,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lyndhurst v. United Cork Cos.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  2. Peragallo v. LunerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  3. STATE EX REL. BD. OF HEALTH v. Sommers Rendering Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. State v. AnnettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  5. State v. ShawNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API