Legal Opinion

United States v. Valente

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 15, 2019No. 17-2311-cr; August Term, 2018PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Concurrence · LynchJudge Lynch, Circuit Judge

Droney, Circuit Judge:

*919 Scott Valente ("Valente") appeals from the district court's amended judgment of conviction entered on July 21, 2017. He contends that his sentence was procedurally and substantively unreasonable and that the district court lacked authority to impose the amended restitution order on resentencing. We vacate a portion of the district court's sentence of incarceration as procedurally unreasonable because of an incorrect criminal history finding, but we affirm the amended restitution order.

VALENTE'S GUILTY PLEA AND SENTENCE

On May 11, 2015, Valente pleaded guilty to a…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Lynch.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Corley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Peugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. United States v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. DupesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Ng Lap SengCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. AquartCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
  3. United States v. Campo FloresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  5. Kenneth W. Tilley, Individually and as Trustee of the Kenneth Tilley Family Trust v. Malvern National Bank and Stephen MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API