Kimmel v. State of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Scudder, EJ. (dissenting).
We respectfully dissent. In our view, plaintiff and her former attorney, appellant Emmelyn Logan-Baldwin, are not entitled to seek attorneys’ fees and expenses pursuant to the New York State Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) (CPLR art 86), and we would therefore affirm the order denying the motions of plaintiff and Logan-Baldwin seeking, inter alia, that relief. Although we recognize that, under the unique circumstances of this case, an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses may be an equitable result, we nevertheless *199conclude that, in drafting the EAJA, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sutka v. ConnersNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Malta Town Centre I, Ltd. v. Town of Malta Board of Assessment ReviewNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- MATTER OF WITTLINGER v. WingNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Greer v. WingNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Scott v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005