Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Stumes v. Bloomberg

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1996No. NonePublished

1ConcurrenceSabers, Justice

[¶ 18] I concur specially.

[¶ 19] As stated in the majority opinion, Stumes is a convicted felon and incarcerated in the South Dakota State Penitentiary. While imprisoned in the State Penitentiary, Stumes’ right to vote is automatically suspended. SDCL 23A-27-35.1 Since Stumes has no right to vote for legislators while imprisoned, he clearly has no right to challenge their legislative actions that do not affect him directly.

*595[¶ 20] Although a taxpayer or elector who seeks to protect a public right may do so without showing a special “injury” or “interest,” it would be illogical and inconsistent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Throndset v. HawkensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Bosteder v. DulingNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Rogers v. Youngblood, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API