Stumes v. Bloomberg
South Dakota Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceSabers, Justice
[¶ 18] I concur specially.
[¶ 19] As stated in the majority opinion, Stumes is a convicted felon and incarcerated in the South Dakota State Penitentiary. While imprisoned in the State Penitentiary, Stumes’ right to vote is automatically suspended. SDCL 23A-27-35.1 Since Stumes has no right to vote for legislators while imprisoned, he clearly has no right to challenge their legislative actions that do not affect him directly.
*595[¶ 20] Although a taxpayer or elector who seeks to protect a public right may do so without showing a special “injury” or “interest,” it would be illogical and inconsistent…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Throndset v. HawkensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Bosteder v. DulingNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
- Rogers v. Youngblood, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.