Legal Opinion

Paige v. Roeding

California Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1891No. 14262PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

— This cause is before us on a motion of respondents to dismiss the appeal, upon the ground that the transcript filed by appellants does not contain a copy of the judgment roll.

Section 950 of the Code of Civil Procedure directs that on an appeal from a final judgment the court must be furnished with a copy of the judgment roll; and section 954 provides that “ if the appellant fails to furnish the requisite papers, the appeal may be dismissed.” This power to dismiss might perhaps be properly exercised in extreme cases; but it frequently happens that the whole of a judgment roll is not “…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Union FM v. Southern Cal. FMCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Tompkins v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Richardson v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Union Flower Market, Ltd. v. Southern California Flower Market, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API