Rosenthal & Grosz v. Jay
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES ?. CLAIBORNE, JUDGE.
Plaintiffs cíala compensation as architects for ser» Tioes rendered the defendant. They allege that they «are engaged hy the defendant V. I. Jay to draw up plana and specifications for certain additions and alterations to premises owned hy said Jay which he desired to convert from homes to apartment houses; that they drew up plana and specifications which sere accepted hy the said V. T. Jay; that under the instructions of Jay they submitted said plans and specifications to several contractors for hide; that the lowest hid received was 915790.80; that Jay rejected…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sully v. PrattSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901