Legal Opinion
ARB, Inc. v. Luz Const., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 16, 1992No. 91-55758Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
972 F.2d 1336
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
ARB, INC., a California Corporation; ARB Fabricated
Systems, Inc.; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
LUZ CONSTRUCTION, INC.; Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company
of California, a California corporation; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-55758.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted July 9, 1992.*
Decided July 16,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Jackson v. Bank of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Price v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Levine v. Diamanthuset, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Armco Industrial Credit Corporation v. Slt Warehouse Company, and Richard B. ConklinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.