Legal Opinion

Shear v. Helm

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 10, 1965No. 44,160PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

The plaintiffs-appellants, William F. Shear and Edith L. Shear, commenced this action for a rescission of a contract for the sale of real estate and to recover $2,000 paid as earnest money. The defendants-appellees, Keith Helm and Katherine Helm, answered, denying they had breached the contract, and in their cross petition sought specific performance of its terms on the part of the plaintiffs-appellants, alleging that they were able to convey a merchantable title in accordance with the contract of sale.

There was little dispute concerning the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Durham v. HadleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  2. Carnine v. BaconSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  3. Ely v. JoslinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  4. State v. BaxterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  5. Robbins v. HannenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Duffin v. PatrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API