Shear v. Helm
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fatzer, J.:
The plaintiffs-appellants, William F. Shear and Edith L. Shear, commenced this action for a rescission of a contract for the sale of real estate and to recover $2,000 paid as earnest money. The defendants-appellees, Keith Helm and Katherine Helm, answered, denying they had breached the contract, and in their cross petition sought specific performance of its terms on the part of the plaintiffs-appellants, alleging that they were able to convey a merchantable title in accordance with the contract of sale.
There was little dispute concerning the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Durham v. HadleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
- Carnine v. BaconSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- Ely v. JoslinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- State v. BaxterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- Robbins v. HannenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Duffin v. PatrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975