Legal Opinion

Bartok v. Bartok

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 24, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

52 N.J. Super. 266 (1958)

145 A.2d 487

MARY BARTOK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

LEWIS M. BARTOK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 29, 1958.

Decided October 24, 1958.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and HANEMAN.

Mr. Clive S. Cummis argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Henry J. Bendheim, attorney, and on the brief).

Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

Defendant appeals a Chancery Division order denying his application for modification of the alimony provisions contained in the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Martindell v. MartindellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Bruguier v. BruguierNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  3. Turi v. TuriNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  4. Dietrick v. DietrickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
  5. Robins v. RobinsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Di Tolvo v. Di TolvoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  2. Hallberg v. HallbergNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  3. Weiner v. WeinerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  4. Ballard v. BallardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. Sterling v. SterlingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API