Legal Opinion
In re Lyman Good Dietary Supplements Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 31, 2019No. 1:17-cv-08047Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: DATE FILED: 10/31/2 019 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------- X : 17-CV-8047 (VEC) In re Lyman Good Dietary Supplements Litigation : : OPINION AND ORDER -------------------------------------------------------------- X VALERIE CAPRONI, United States District Judge: This action stems from Plaintiff Lyman Good’s suspension from the Ultimate Fighting Championship (“UFC”) after testing positive for illicit anabolic steroids. Plaintiff claims that Defendants sold him a dietary supplement, Anavite, that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Nikitas Amorgianos v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Nimely v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.