Legal Opinion

City of Niagara Falls v. Hartford Fire Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 24, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified, on the law, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Special Term erroneously denied The Hartford Fire Insurance Company’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the city’s third cause of action seeking punitive damages and attorney’s fees for Hartford’s disclaimer of coverage for damage to the interior of the city’s library building caused by a storm on June 21, 1981. Punitive damages are not recoverable for a private breach of contract where a public right is not sought to be vindicated or morally culpable…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. GTF Marketing, Inc. v. Colonial Aluminum Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Heath v. Soloff Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Reifenstein v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Ferguson v. TemmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aurnou v. CraigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. C.I.T. Leasing Corp. v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API