Legal Opinion

In re the Will of Halbert

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 15, 1895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Proceeding to revoke the decree of probate heretofore entered.

1Opinion of the Court

Calker, S.

This proceeding is to revoke the decree entered in the surrogate’s office of Oneida county on the 3d day of December, 1894, admitting to probate, after a prolonged contest, the last will and testament of Martha B. Halbert, deceased.

Surrogate Bright, before whom the evidence was taken, died before rendering his decision, and by stipulation of all parties the ease was submitted to Surrogate Bentley, who upheld the validity of said instrument.

On the 10th day of December, 1894, a petition was filed by the contestants asking that said decree of probate be revoked, alleging, as a basis…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Peck v. . CaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. Horn v. . PullmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Dobie v. . ArmstrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. In Re the Probate of the Will of SnellingNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. In re the Probate of Two Papers Propounded as the Last Will & Testament of FormanNew York Supreme Court · 1869

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Contested Will of BrushNew York Surrogate's Court · 1901
  2. In re Proving the Will of WoolseyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1896
  3. Watson v. HolmesNew York Supreme Court · 1913
  4. In re the Probate of the Will of ElyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1896
  5. In re Carpenter's WillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API