Carmichael v. Vandebur
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Lucas District Coivrt. This is an action to recover damages for the alleged fraudulent representations of defendants, by -which plaintiff was induced to purchase of defendants certain real estate.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Lucas District Coivrt. This is an action to recover damages for the alleged fraudulent representations of defendants, by -which plaintiff was induced to purchase of defendants certain real estate. It is averred in substance, in the petition, that defendants represented that said real estate had been sold to them at sheriff’s sale; that the time for redemption would expire in about fifteen days, when, if there should be no redemption, the sheriff would make a deed which would convey a perfect title, excepting that the holder of the sheriff’s deed would have to redeem from a…
1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.
i. practice : ievISi4' I. It appears from the record that the verdict was returned on the 12th day of November, 1877. On the 14th day of the same month a motion for a new trial was filed, submitted and taken under advisement, and the cause continued until the next term. On the 25th day of December, and in vacation, the motion fora new trial was overruled, andón January 11, 1878, in vacation, a judgment was entered upon the verdict of the jury. The appeal' was taken in April, 1878.
It is now assigned as error that the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial, and in rendering…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Hoock v. BowmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Green v. StrotherCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1919
- McGibbons v. WilderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- Shuttlefield v. NeilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Holmes v. RiversSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.