Legal Opinion

In re Oliner

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 10, 1919No. 49PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. In the matter of Saul Oliner and Isidor Oliner, trading as Oliner Bros., bankrupts. On appeal from order refusing discharge.

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal brings before the court the right of the bankrupts to their discharge. The court below, confirming the report of the special master, has denied to the bankrupts individually and as copartners a discharge.

The bankrupts were engaged in the business of private banicing in the city of New York. It is alleged that they filed a false statement with the comptroller of the state of New York, in order that that official might permit them to continue in the private banicing business and to accept and receive deposits for safe-keeping as well as for transmission.

It may…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Firestone v. HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  2. In re TannerDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1911
  3. In re ZofferCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robinson v. J. R. Williston & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1920
  2. In Re FordDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API